منابع مشابه
Contrasting Classic, Straussian, and Constructivist Grounded Theory: Methodological and Philosophical Conflicts
Grounded Theory (GT) is an innovative research methodology, consisting of three prevailing traditions: Classic, Straussian, and Constructivist GT. Despite arising from the same root, and sharing a number of the original methodological techniques, Classic, Straussian, and Constructivist GT have nevertheless diverged to such an extent that they are neither homogenous nor interchangeable methodolo...
متن کاملPossible conflicts, ARRs, and conflicts
Consistency-based diagnosis is the most widely used approach to model-based diagnosis within the Artificial Intelligence community. It is usually carried out through an iterative cycle of behavior prediction, conflict detection, and candidate generation and refinement. Many approaches to consistency-based diagnosis have relied on some kind of on-line dependency-recording mechanism for conflict ...
متن کاملClassic Migraine or Not Classic Migraine
OBJECTIVE To identify the main characteristics of classic migraine, with specific regard to diagnostic criteria for manual therapy practitioners, including chiropractors and osteopaths. METHOD Ten case studies on migraine were reviewed for the symptoms and clinical features. RESULTS The majority of cases reviewed as classic migraines were in reality not correct diagnoses in accordance with ...
متن کاملMulticausality: Confounding - Assignment solutions
1. a. Reserpine is a risk factor. Overall, the incidence of breast cancer is 10.47 per 100,000 women-years in reserpine users and 6.14 per 100,000 women-years in nonusers. Moreover, among the non-obese, the rate ratio is: 6.40/4.10 = 1.6. Looking in the non-obese women avoids potential confounding by obesity if it is a risk factor. b. Obesity is also a risk factor. The overall incidence rates f...
متن کاملConfounding and control
This paper deals both with the issues of confounding and of control, as the definition of a confounding factor is far from universal and there exist different methodological approaches, ex ante and ex post, for controlling for a confounding factor. In the first section the paper compares some definitions of a confounder given in the demographic and epidemiological literature with the definition...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: BMJ
سال: 2009
ISSN: 0959-8138,1468-5833
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2397